its a simple point really, all of the anarchists that I have come across (on this sight and in the real world) are wannabe socialogist archair philosophers that couldn't survive a weekend in the woods let alone the inevitable violence that would ensue given the introduction of a actual anarchy in a society like the one we live in today. As for the definition of anarchy, despite the plethora of definition attributed to the word by today's anti government supporters, anarchy simply means the absence of government. You see, I know that will happen in the absence of government because its happened before. A few of these include, france in the late 1700s, russia in 1910, Iraq after the fall of the hussein regime, and New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. You see, a anarchy is not, as many would have you believe, a marxist eutopia or some ultimate free commune, its a power vacumn that will either lead to the take over of the are by some new power or the rise of the mob. Both of these senarios will be inevitably violent, and anyone not ready to defend themselves will most likely be swept away before order reasserts itself in the form of a new possbily better, possible worse, government body.

--
1. Punishment must be cruel and unusual to be effective
2. If you don't like the U.S. you can leave, we don't want you anyway.
3. 90% of anarchists would die during the first few hours of an anarchy.

But we still can't kill or declare war on the Lousiana government. People will always die, but there are no need to make it worse by starting wars.

--
"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."

~Karl Marx

Nazism is an enemy to society. Never give it a chance to blossom.
Unite against the RAC!